Skip to content

Update README icon#261

Open
zhangh43 wants to merge 1 commit intoeloqdata:mainfrom
zhangh43:r2
Open

Update README icon#261
zhangh43 wants to merge 1 commit intoeloqdata:mainfrom
zhangh43:r2

Conversation

@zhangh43
Copy link
Contributor

@zhangh43 zhangh43 commented Oct 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated feature section headings for cleaner visual presentation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed emoji characters from section headings in the Key Features section of README.md, preserving all feature descriptions and content unchanged. This is a formatting adjustment to the documentation's visual presentation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README.md formatting
README.md
Removed emoji characters from Key Features section headings; feature content remains intact

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • liangjchen

Poem

🐰 Emojis hop away from titles now,
Plain text stands proudly, take a bow—
Features still shine, though stripped of flair,
The README breathes cleaner air!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The pull request title "Update README icon" is vague and ambiguous about the specific changes made. While it is technically related to the changeset—which involved modifying emojis (which could be considered icons) in the README—the title fails to clearly communicate the nature of the change. The actual change was removing multiple emojis from section headings, but the title uses singular "icon" and the term "update," which could misleadingly suggest adding or modifying an icon rather than removing emojis. A teammate scanning the commit history would not clearly understand that the primary change was removing emojis from section headings in the Key Features section. To make the title clearer and more specific, consider revising it to something like "Remove emojis from README section headings" or "Strip icons from Key Features headings." This would more accurately reflect the actual changes and help reviewers quickly understand what was modified without needing to inspect the diff.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

55-57: Reduce repetition of "Scales" at sentence beginnings.

Three consecutive bullet points all begin with "Scales", which is repetitive and impacts readability. Consider rewording at least one or two of these sentences for better variety.

- Scales compute and memory **100x faster** than traditional databases by avoiding data movement on disk.
- Scales storage independently, so CPU resources remain constant when data volume grows but traffic stays the same.
- Scales redo logs independently to optimize write throughput.
+ Compute and memory scale **100x faster** than traditional databases by avoiding data movement on disk.
+ Storage scales independently, so CPU resources remain constant when data volume grows but traffic stays the same.
+ Redo logs scale independently to optimize write throughput.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcbd725 and 3e4a704.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~57-~57: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ume grows but traffic stays the same. - Scales redo logs independently to optimize wri...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

41-63: Emoji removal from Key Features section headings is complete.

The changes successfully remove emojis from all six section headings in the Key Features section while preserving all content and descriptions. The documentation remains clear and readable without the emoji visual elements.

EloqDoc seamlessly manages hot and cold data across **memory, local NVMe cache, and object storage**. Since NVMe storage is ephemeral and lost when a node crashes, EloqDoc uses it strictly as a cache for object storage. This design ensures that all data remains safe and durable in cross-AZ object storage while still benefiting from NVMe-level performance for frequently accessed data.

### 🌐 Truely Distributed Database
### Truely Distributed Database
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix spelling error: "Truely" → "Truly".

Line 49 contains a spelling error in the section heading.

-### Truely Distributed Database
+### Truly Distributed Database
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
### Truely Distributed Database
### Truly Distributed Database
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 49, the section heading contains a misspelling "Truely
Distributed Database"; change "Truely" to "Truly" so the heading reads "Truly
Distributed Database" and save the file.

Copy link
Collaborator

@githubzilla githubzilla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants